![]() ![]() Nor should we forget the tens of millions of dollars misappropriated by the international community via the UN compensation committee (UNCC) in Geneva (2), which was largely manipulated by the US. ![]() The programme was subject to strict monitoring: if there were breaches, the US bears at least as much responsibility for them as the UN (1). No decision could be taken without endorsement by the US which, together with Britain, vetoed contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars on the grounds that certain products might be used to manufacture weapons of mass destruction, which we now know were a figment of the imagination of US strategists. Those lists, like all details of Iraqi transactions, were drawn up meticulously by the UN Security Council’s sanctions committee, made up of council representatives and operated by consensus. ![]() It contains all the relevant information, including lists of all items supplied to Iraq in each six-month period. But it must be immediately pointed out that there is a wealth of public documentation on the operation of the programme since 1996. These are serious accusations that warrant detailed investigation. Certain senior UN officials, particularly the man in charge of the programme, Benon Sevan, are said to have pocketed large kickbacks, and it is claimed that foreign, especially French, politicians took similar advantage of the system. It is alleged that from 1996 to 2003 the United Nations oil-for-food programme enabled Saddam Hussein to misappropriate hundreds of millions of dollars. THE United States Congress is angry about a scandal. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |